French defence posture under the President Macron experienced abrupt changes after he appointed a Commission tasked to draft a new White Paper on French defence. This rapidity explained merely by the massive engagement of the French troops to current missions both abroad and at home.
Some 30000 French soldiers are permanently deployed on missions ranging from Operation “Barkhane” in Mali and the NATO-led reassurance mission on the Alliance’s eastern flank to Operation “Sentinelle,” carried out on France’s national territory and aimed at protecting vital state institutions from terrorism.
Such extensive use of France’s Armed Forces in current operations has brought into question their ability of French defence to respond to new crises or emerging threats. For instance, in September France’s Chief of the General Staff,
The new White Paper on defence titled the Strategic Review (Revue stratégique) and published on October 13, reevaluated the threats that France is facing and proposes new approaches to navigate the French Republic’s defence policy and forces in the unstable and unpredictable multipolar environment that has been replacing the Post-Cold War order.
This increase would bring France closer to the NATO defence spending criteria of 2% of GDP spent, but to fully meet that standard, France would have to spend €50 bn per year instead of the €32 bn that is currently allocated.
Even with additional €1,7 bn yearly through 2025, the more significant figure seems a bit distant.
Terrorism defined as a principal and immediate threat to the French state; this is not surprising given recent events, including the terrorist attack of November 13, 2015, which shook the French nation. The Strategic Review also recognizes that the return of coercion by demonstration of force and even the potential for open war in Europe constitutes a significant threat for Paris as well.
Moscow has challenged the EU and NATO and actively blocks the activity of international institutions, including the UN and the OSCE while promoting alternative regional projects such as the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Regarding the Middle East, the Strategic Review sees Russia, Iran, and Turkey as the dominant forces that are shaping the future of the region.
The Strategic Review outlines two main ambitions for France, in its role as a UN Security Council permanent member and a nuclear powerhouse: first is to preserve strategic autonomy; second is to build a more powerful Europe.
Maintenance and upgrade of its nuclear weapons are of paramount importance for Paris. Nuclear deterrence gives France strategic autonomy that is a crucial issue for Paris per se since it allows France to continue making independent decisions regarding the protection of its national interests.
Speaking of the Euro-Atlantic space, the Strategic Review recognizes the importance of NATO and seeks to strengthen the European security.
Moreover, Paris confirms its commitment to further undertake all responsibilities within NATO, including the collective defence clause of the Washington Treaty as well as reassurance measures and the strengthening of NATO’s eastern flank. It is worth noting that earlier this year France sent a contingent of around 306 soldiers, Leclerc battle tanks and IVFs to Estonia.
We can expect France to be more open to cooperation in defence matters with the EU and NATO partners. For instance, such collaboration will extend to strategic airlift and, more broadly, logistics and defence industry cooperation, as well as joint military operations. However, much of such cooperation is likely to be concentrated with the countries bordering France.
You might be interested in: Georgia – A New Cornerstone in Transatlantic Relations